diff --git a/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Pricing.-.md b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Pricing.-.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b0e51b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Pricing.-.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+reCAPTCHA v2 is one of the most common challenges on the web, covering the familiar checkbox to silent and callback variants. CapSkip handles all of these on your own machine quickly, which means your automation does not stall every time one appears. Because it mirrors popular solver APIs, wiring it in tends to be straightforward.
+
+A Python codebase developers have a clean path with CapSkip, which emulates the request format of popular solving services. In practice, that means pointing existing code at CapSkip takes little changes - no rewrite.
+
+Selenium remains a go-to for browser automation, and CapSkip fits right in. Your the WebDriver logic as is and hand off the challenge to CapSkip whenever one shows up, so the session keeps going with no human input.
+
+A short switch-over plan makes the move smooth: point the API URL at CapSkip, confirm a few real solves, then flip production. Since the API matches major services, most of the work is essentially done.
+
+The developer API is designed to emulate the request format of major CAPTCHA-solving services. In practical terms, tools and tools that already target those services can switch to CapSkip with minimal changes and no new code.
+
+Automated browsers leave signals which detection systems look at, so pairing solid automation hygiene with reliable CAPTCHA solving matters. CapSkip covers the solving half so you focus on the browser side.
+
+Synthetic monitoring scripts which sign in to portals will trip over a surprise CAPTCHA. Using CapSkip clearing the challenge on your own machine, monitors stay reliable rather than throwing false failures.
+
+The v3 flavor works differently: rather than a clickable challenge, it rates interactions silently. Getting a usable token takes a solver that handles the way v3 works, and CapSkip is designed to handle it, returning tokens quickly so your flow keeps moving.
+
+Before you commit, there is a cheap one-week trial gives you a thousand solves, which is enough to test how well it works against your sites. Once it does the job, upgrading is just a quick step in the Members Area.
+
+A major advantages of running locally is cost. Traditional services charge per solve, so your costs climb as throughput increases. CapSkip uses flat-rate pricing and unlimited solves, so you can scale without worrying about the meter.
+
+The browser extension brings solving right into the browser and Chromium-based browsers like Brave and Edge. For manual work or light automation, the extension handles challenges and needs no extra configuration.
+
+Language coverage means CapSkip handle CAPTCHAs across many locales, which is important the moment your sites are international. [this guide](https://hackthehill.io/juliannehoutma) breadth helps keep success rates steady regardless of where a site is.
+
+Broad language support means CapSkip work with CAPTCHAs across a wide range of languages, which is important the moment the targets span international. That breadth helps keep success rates steady regardless of where the target is based.
+
+A Selenium setup is a staple for browser automation, and CapSkip drops right in. You keep your driver flow as is and hand off the challenge to CapSkip when one appears, so the run continues without human steps.
+
+Beyond the API, CapSkip comes with client libraries plus sample code that shorten integration time. Instead of hand-rolling raw HTTP calls, developers are able to lean on ready-made helpers for popular languages.
+
+Test automation teams run into CAPTCHAs as well, particularly when testing live environments that copy production. Rather than disabling these tests, teams can have CapSkip clear the challenge so the suite stays intact.
+
+Used responsibly, CAPTCHA solving supports legitimate work such as testing, monitoring, and authorized scraping. It is wise honoring a site's terms and relevant rules; handled that way, a solver is simply a productivity tool.
+
+Fundamentally,  [Https://gogs.feld-4qa.de](https://gogs.xn--feld-4qa.de/maybellestow8/5641557/wiki/Keeping+It+Private%3A+The+Case+for+Solving+CAPTCHAs+on+Your+Own+Machine) a CAPTCHA solver reads a challenge and returns the answer a site expects, so an hands-off tool can continue. The difference with CapSkip is the work stays locally - no challenge data leaves your hardware, and you avoid per-solve charges. That combination of privacy and predictable cost is hard to beat for serious automation.
+
+Turnstile has become a common barrier on pages that want to block bots without the usual image puzzles. CapSkip solves Turnstile on your machine in a few seconds, covering the challenge variants. For scrapers that run into Turnstile, this takes away a real obstacle.
+
+Google reCAPTCHA v2 remains among the most widespread challenges on the web, from the familiar checkbox to silent and callback versions. CapSkip solves all of these locally quickly, which means your automation will not grind to a halt every time one shows up. Because it mirrors common solver APIs, wiring it in is straightforward.
+
+Classic image and text CAPTCHAs remain extremely common, from login forms to checkout screens. CapSkip recognizes a huge range of image CAPTCHA variants on your own hardware, usually in about a tenth of a second. This throughput matters when you process high volumes.
\ No newline at end of file